SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Bizarre Web Sites

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dacoola who wrote (563)1/24/2002 6:01:35 AM
From: bela_ghoulashi  Read Replies (1) of 5701
 
Well, now, that's a useful link. Here's an example of its handiwork:

My complaint about Ms. Bonnuss In Austin

I've been hesitating to write this letter, because I've been afraid that, if I did, Ms. Bonnuss In Austin would do everything in her power to make me develop an eating disorder. But after reading about Bonnuss's disingenuous nostrums, I could hesitate no longer. One of the first facts we should face is that it would be a strategic blunder of epic proportions for Bonnuss to doctor evidence and classification systems and make gutless generalizations to support vulgar, preconceived views. Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter. So let me corroborate it by saying that some people say that that isn't sufficient evidence to prove that Bonnuss is secretly scheming to undermine the intellectual purpose of higher education. And I must agree; one needs much more evidence than that. But the evidence is there, for anyone who isn't afraid to look at it. Just look at the way that her claim that merit is adequately measured by her methods and qualifications is factually unsupported and politically motivated. But this is something to be filed away for future letters. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that if we don't stand up and fight for our heritage, traditions, and values right now, then Bonnuss's memoirs will soon start to metastasize until they overthrow democratic political systems. Bonnuss's attempts to deflect attention from Bonnuss's unwillingness to support policies that benefit the average citizen are much worse than mere blackguardism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation. Bonnuss just wants to avoid detection and punishment. To top that off, I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I, for one, claim that there is, because it seems that no one else is telling you that the idea that people want perfidious smart alecks to condone illegal activities is a fundamental misunderstanding of the human condition. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, I'm willing to accept that Bonnuss lives and breathes particularism. I'm even willing to accept that she has gone around the bend with her paranoia. But if you can go more than a minute without hearing her talk about defeatism, you're either deaf, dumb, or in a serious case of denial.

It is squalid and more than deceitful to believe that the Earth is flat, as if it made any difference. Currently, Bonnuss lacks the clout to fix blame for social stress, economic loss, or loss of political power on a target group whose constructed guilt provides a simplistic explanation. But by the end of the decade, she will have enough yes-men to perpetuate misguided and questionable notions of other superficial, wayward scatterbrains' intentions. The key point here is that she should think about how her perorations lead prissy, ill-bred bozos of various stripes to procure explosive devices, gasoline, and detonators for use in an upcoming campaign of terror. If Bonnuss doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps she should just keep quiet. Given the unimaginative political rhetoric of our times, she is not only immoral, but amoral.

For heaven's sake, Bonnuss's nugatory, uppity words destabilize the already volatile social fabric that she purportedly aims to save. Bonnuss then blames us for that. Now there's a prizewinning example of psychological projection if I've ever seen one. Taking that notion one step further, we can see that her idea of snooty fogyism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of a loathsome blood-lust. It is, in every sense, an unpatriotic and pagan religion that incites its worshippers to a sanctimonious frenzy and then prompts them to use both overt and covert deceptions to popularize a genre of music whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge what I call appalling wackos to promote the total destruction of individuality in favor of an all-powerful group. Does anybody else feel the way I do, or am I alone in my disgust with Ms. Bonnuss In Austin?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext