RMIL Revisited Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : RMIL Revisited

RMIL 0.00

Jan 2 3:00 PM EDT

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jane4IceCream who started this subject	1/24/2002 7:11:09 AM
From: ChrisJP	Read Replies (2) of 5

Hi Jane, I actually made money on the original OVIS run back in ..... was it 1997 or 1998 ? I was like the week before Labor Day. Funny -- every time I mention a stock scam (like ENE) to my 15 year old son -- he says it reminds him of OVIS, lol. What do FAMH and OVIS/RMIL have in common ? I'll tell ya. I call it "The Big Lie". OVIS's investment premise was based on the belief that there was a huge "naked short" position held by the MMs. But very early on, during one of the "share roll calls", it was clear that JUST THE SI THREAD POSTERS owned more shares than were reported to be in the float. Yet these posters, no matter how many times it was mentioned, could not grasp that this was impossible -- but obviously OVIS/RMIL was printing shares. FAMH -- I still remember reading Doug R.'s "56 Point TA" thread when I saw Cheryl OD's post: "FAMH -- eleven cent stock earning .18 per year !!" The FAMH lies were pretty big and obvious. I never bought a single share. Poor "Little Engine". So much abuse for trying to point out the obvious. lol Of course -- there's Pets.com -- "Its ok to have an advertising budget greater than our ANNUAL REVENUES !!" I'm sure a bunch of people believed that too. Chris

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next