SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 214.90-0.1%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Petz who wrote (68737)1/24/2002 1:18:08 PM
From: Ali ChenRead Replies (4) of 275872
 
"I think this report also gives proof that Sysmark 2001 is totally unreliable in measuring system performance. it showed a 92% speedup with a 36% increase in CPU clock."

The Sysmark does what it is supposed to do - to measure
the _system_ performance. The result simply
says that the performance of peripherals and memory
is more important than the raw CPU speed on the
Sysmark-selected set of applications.

"This is, of course, physically impossible unless the measurement is faulty."

If in your workload the CPU mostly waits for data
from memory or for completions of disk transfers
(or finishing polygons drawings), and you increase
the overall system clock by 2x, your performance will
also jump by about 2x regardless of CPU speed.

Regards,

- Ali
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext