SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 203.14-0.8%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Charles Gryba who wrote (68940)1/25/2002 5:30:40 PM
From: g_w_northRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
>>, I don't see how this is different than 3dnow vs sse and sse2. sse and sse2 compatible cpus now outnumber 3dnow cpus even though the former was introduced first and had more than 6 months lead. No one complained when Intel did that.<<

Yes, but these are extensions to the basic code. I'm not that well versed in the nitty-gritty details but I do know that MMX, SSE etc. don't interfere with the basic underlying architecture of the overall chip. If 3DNow! or some form of SSE is present on the chip this will allow certain applications to take advantage of those instruction sets. They will not interfere compatibility wise. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext