Zeev's Turnips - No Politics Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (24836)	1/28/2002 12:39:09 AM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (1) of 99280

One has insiders buying but the other has insiders selling like mad all year at prices of $30-40. The chart on one looks good and the chart on the other looks not so good. I guess the question is: can SIMG become profitable? If the answer to that question is yes, and reasonably soon, then I would prefer to buy the smaller market cap company. Otherwise I guess a high PE is better than no PE at all. In short, I guess I do not know, but if I can quote someone famous: "If the TA and the FA do not jive, believe the TA". GNSS is 48% short and SIMG is 2% short. As a person that believes the shorts are usually correct, 48% short interest in GNSS seems like an alarm. So I just guess I will remain confused, but if I had to buy one, I think I would take the one making new highs with a near perfect chart since Sept, but most likely I will watch it for a while. GNSS seems likely to fall to the 200 EMA at about 41. Of course my question to you was on fundamentals, and looking further it is hard to say if those increases in revenue will make it profitable or not. M

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next