Gold Price Monitor Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor

GDXJ 97.44

-1.2%

4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: goldsheet who wrote (81197)	1/28/2002 2:40:22 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (2) of 116759

Is there any way we can crank that population back to one billion by say 2050 without too much trouble? If we can come up with a bomb that has no residual radiation but lots of bang, I am sure we can supply the reasons to use it. We don't seem to be able to get the other guy to keep it in his pants with any efficacy. With the present population curve operative it appears that we will be out of food and energy in less than 75 years. War will have to ensue. Extra planetary plans or high tech survival weapons will be de rigeur for continuity of civilzation. I vote that we kill other people and not ourselves as an effective Malthusian check. I have worked through the hypothesis of people starving in a cabin and only enough food for half the people until spring. 1/2 have to die for the others to survive. Try as I might, if I were in that cabin, I would not select suicide as the honourable option. The survival gene belongs to the nasty. Maybe that is why Yogi Berra said nice guys finish last. Maybe they don't finish at all. Just a nasty survivor. EC<:-}

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next