SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (6483)1/28/2002 7:15:28 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (2) of 14610
 
After reviewing this a bit, I think that the judge got a little overzealous. Parental misbehavior surrounding their children's sports is a longstanding hotpoint for many people. I think that the judge took this opportunity to send a message to parents who can't control themselves.

I don't think that the sentence was about rehabilitation as I suspect a minimal sentence would accomplish this.

I also don't think that it is appropriate as a form of retribution as it seems way out of whack when compared to the punishment meted out for like verdicts.

IMO, the sentencing was a way for the judge to say "see, we are doing something about these parents who can't control themselves". Of course, I don't think that the sentencing will really accomplish the goal. I would compare it to the war on drugs. No real results, but at least it looks like they are doing something.

In summary, I think that the sentence was a bit harsh.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News