IGIT. In your last post you also said..." So your scenario of a non-radical Muslim ending support for a radical Muslim, makes a Muslim not adherent to their religion and scripture. You see, any Muslim, radical or non-radical, can not be reponsible for the death, in any way, of another Muslim, no matter what the radical Muslim does.
And even if the non-radical Muslim ends support for the radical Muslim, and the result is the radical Muslim being killed, they are guilty of not following their writings.
I was responding to you explanation of the scripture that you posted, not to the scripture itself.
The scripture itself is of no importance to me but what a muslim may think any particular scripture means is important to me in understanding why the religion of islam would kill innocent people in the name of Allah.
You also said..." If a Muslim gives evidence of another Muslim killing a non-Muslim, it might result in the killing of a Muslim. That is a "no no" as far as I can see."....
So this part of the religion of islam was designed to prevent muslims from giving evidence against another muslim no matter what crime they may have committed.
You know what IGIT, I find it very hard to believe that this kind of thing is the word of Allah. How about you do you find this hard to believe??
Lorne |
