The ENRON Scandal Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The ENRON Scandal

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: PartyTime who wrote (1589)	1/29/2002 11:01:04 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) of 5185

Gephardt is a stuffed shirt and even more so tonight because it would be unseemly to pull a Jim Carville act. Better for junkyard dogs like me to do it on these chat threads. Here's one that really galls me: cnn.com Now we know that the reason Cheney is stiffing the GAO on the Energy Policy/Enron connection is because there's so much stink with Enron's dirty grasping fingerprints all over that misbegotten handout to the dinosaur class petroleum based energy sector. But this latest revelation that Bush wants kid gloves in the looking into the activities of the intelligence community in the run-up to 9/11 makes a skeptical person ask why. And the paranoid to assume that when, as reported by Le Figaro, the CIA station chief in Abu Dhabi met with Bin Laden in the American Hospital there, that they weren't swapping notes on good tax havens. Kinda like the run up to the Gulf War when April Glasspie, the Bush 41 Ambassador to Iraq gave Saddam the green light to do what he cared to with his Province 19, i.e. Kuwait. What the heck does Bush have to hide this time? Damn, this is getting monotonous. This secrecy stuff is sooooo tedious. And it stinks to high heaven. -Ray

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next