SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maurice Winn who wrote (14220)1/30/2002 1:13:43 PM
From: Stock Farmer  Read Replies (1) of 74559
 
clever... but missing of the point.

Which is merely this: hoaxes make a poor store of value.

Gold? Hmmm... jury's out. But at least a physical cost of production puts a lower bound on incremental absolute value provided the existence of marginal demand.

Which cost of production is slightly higher than another piece of specially printed paper, which itself is higher than the cost of shifting a few electron-digits in the bits of a shift register somewhere.

There is a school of thought that would have you measure goodness in a store of value by the ratio of face value to intrinsic value. And if we take as a premise that stocks are a money-transfer vehicle (a.k.a. hoax), then besides our money-at-risk capital ventures (a.k.a. hoaxes not yet played out) we might want to have a means to safeguard our ill-gotten gains from the hoaxes of others being perpetrated upon us (a.k.a. a store of value).

Better than electrons (also hoaxes) and better than paper (a hoax of a different color).

John
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext