SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The ENRON Scandal

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JBTFD who wrote (1806)1/30/2002 3:29:45 PM
From: The Duke of URLĀ©  Read Replies (1) of 5185
 
agree pump and dump is dangerous, but the Enron fiasco, when all is told, will I think be worse for the credibility of our markets and financial system.



But don't you see the simularity?

In your typical pump and dump, you have non licensed people dealing in stock "fraud". They don't disclose to you that the balance sheet, although, it tells you that 10 Zillion shares are authorized, like most balance sheets, on this one they are ISSUED or will be issued at a moments notice.

In Enron, on a VERY PRELIMINARY basis, one of the problems is that potentional debt was not debt on the balance sheet because it was guarenteed by the issuance of STOCK. (Stock goes in the equity account, not in the debt account, cute huh?)

This is almost the same type of option that is not fully disclosed on the balance sheet of the pump and dump.

(The cute part of the pump and dump, that I have always liked is that to explain the extra shares floating around they invent the "short" squeeze, whereas Arthur Anderson I AM TOLD used "8 pages of footnotes". Same thing. :))
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext