SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: SirRealist who wrote (17690)1/31/2002 9:56:03 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Al Qaida fighters and foreign mercenaries who joined the Taleban have no claim to a definition as a soldier.

And I think you've hit the crux of the matter there SirRealist. These guys are mercenaries, coming from various nations to fight a war. And as such they cannot be deemed to be legitmate combatants under law of war. They represented NO NATIONAL ENTITY, but were merely people who were employed by a group of indiviudals, primarily Bin Laden, to conduct operations against a national entity, the US, via terrorism and targeting non-combatants.

Thus, I would opine that you're quite correct, and that the final disposition will be that they are declared to be mercenaries. A humorous example would be if Bill Gates hired thousands of people to wage war against the US, in retaliation for the MSFT lawsuit, they would be considered mercenaries, not legitimate combatants, since they represent a cause, not a national entity (though many have opined that Bill would like to believe MSFT is a nation unto itself).

The Taleban fighters, on the other hand, were part of the government of Afghanistan. But even as such, many non-Afghans were hired by the Taleban to fight for them, and they can be declared as mercenaries by the current Afghan government.

Hawk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext