SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 248.42-4.0%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: michael97123 who wrote (59860)2/1/2002 11:46:08 AM
From: willcousa  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
I don't know the answer as to which is the greater threat. My view of history is that the most paranoid do the craziest things - this would seem to be North Korea. I have visited Iran and would be surprised if there were not a lot of folks who would like to be back on the secular track of governance. They know from experience how much better things can be with more freedom. Still, Saddam seems to be on a persistant course of achieving the means to wipe out his enemies. So that brings me to a toss-up between NK (dangerous if they do act) and Iraq (proven to have the desire and guts to act) with Iran probably most capable but least inclined.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext