Amein,
You said, "It's not whether it's a lie or not....". But you also said, "and yes, an authenticated copy of the Quran has not been altered by Muslim religious figures... the Quran we have now is the same of 1400 years ago..."
The article is either lying or its not! Your second statement can not be true, and also the article. The article must be a lie, or not, because it says there are differences. Quoting the article, "What's more, some of these fragments revealed small but intriguing aberrations from the standard Koranic text. Such aberrations, though not surprising to textual historians, are troublingly at odds with the orthodox Muslim belief that the Koran as it has reached us today is quite simply the perfect, timeless, and unchanging Word of God."
If you wish to reserve judgement on this, I will respect that. But if the article and evidence shows differences, which it says it does, you will have to say the article is lying, or not.
God Bless,
IGIT |
