You are saying that wholly unqualified individuals should be left on the job once in it, so long as they aren't completely murderous and insane. That, Ann, is TOO LOW OF A STANDARD you are accepting. Period!, you simply Have to agree, I'd think, when you think about it.
Sept. 11 may have been partly a result of Clinton's legal troubles(basically, he had 8 years of being on the defense due to his deficiencies and the thus just attacks leveled against him) distracting him from doing such right things as diligently fighting terrorism, as another has just rather accurately outlined in replying to you here. But even if that's accurate, the root of 911 was a clash between a rabidly strict and soured religious culture, and the rest of the world(if especially America).
In other words, it goes far beyond Clinton's failures, regardless the root of those failures. Even if Clinton had supported America as he should have, even if we were as tough as tough can be, and strong in the face of distraction, odds are, because of the root nature of the problem, that we'd face a 911 anyway in time...I don't care if G.I Joe Rocky Swartzenegger were President!(remember him?) for the last 20 years let alone just a few with a guy distracted by legal problems- it would have happened in these times.
Dan B |
