Ann, your "in other words" interpretation of me, doesn't even resemble the problem I noted from your posts.
Again, IF a President doesn't have what it takes to be President(as you said was true in Clinton's case- and I agree), THEN the responsible thing to do would, I think reasonably, be to remove him from office ASAP.
IF we are talking about a President we agree is quite adequate and qualified, and about trumped-up charges amounting to a hill of beans, brought by the opposing party, then I'd agree with what seems to be your peeve here, and any such frivolous charges likely would NOT be taken up by congress via impeachment hearings, such charges would have to wait. Given the rarity of impeachment hearings in our history, I'm quite in favor of leaving the impeachment process in the law. I guess it is clear from what you've written, that you'd be in favor of removing impeachment from the Constitution.
Dan B |
