SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Market Timer's Hall of Fame

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Moominoid who wrote (88)2/4/2002 12:25:47 AM
From: velociraptor_  Read Replies (1) of 121
 
My long term count may or may not be correct. In fact, I have taken a stance back from the long term Nasdaq count since I really have several possibilites and none are too clear. I think the dynamics of this count are going to be a little different from the DOW and S&P because the Nasdaq is not as old. Some say that there was a 5 wave count down into the March 2001 lows as you do, but I don't think this is correct either. That puts wave 2 and 4 on different time magnitude degrees and it just doesn't look right. Also, the C wave in B would have to retrace a good part of the A drop and that means a move up to 2500 to 3000 at least. No way this is going to happen. There is most likely some other complex count here that most have not touched on yet, and probably won't be clear for a while.

Short term...yup, I could be wrong there too, but it's working so far, and I'll change it when it doesn't. Such is the life of an EW theorist. :o)

By the way, Wollie's B wave high in early 2000 is without a doubt incorrect. That puts the C wave down as some complex structure and it should be be a simple 5 wave count. Also, the drop into Sept 21st off the May high was clearly only 3 waves for all indexes and he never resolves this.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext