SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Market Timer's Hall of Fame

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: velociraptor_ who wrote (109)2/4/2002 2:09:26 AM
From: Moominoid   of 121
 
Velo - thanks for your comments. I often read your commentary on your website. I'm banned from posting on the e-wave workspace....

Some say that there was a 5 wave count down into the March 2001 lows as you do, but I don't think this is correct either. That puts wave 2 and 4 on different time magnitude degrees and it just doesn't look right.

I can see the other two possible counts - 5 waves till Sep01 and ABC into Sep01. The former is my main alternative, the latter is gem-x's and I think unlikely - A is short in time and I think the tech market is still way overvalued. Looking on a monthly basis wave 4 does look of similar size to 2 - I am using stochastics and other TA to make an initial cut of the waves and this is what that leads to.

Also, the C wave in B would have to retrace a good part of the A drop and that means a move up to 2500 to 3000 at least.

That's what I am looking for. I believe we are at the end of 2 of C and going higher....

There is most likely some other complex count here that most have not touched on yet, and probably won't be clear for a while.

Wolanchuk thinks the top in Mar 2001 is a B wave, then 5 down till September.

I don't buy the we are in 4 of A still either because wave 4 is just way big then. The count on your site seems to break the e-wave rules because wave 5 of the advance to Sep 00 is just too low. But that would explain why there seem to be 3 waves up from 98 as Wollie has noted and called B.

By the way, Wollie's B wave high in early 2000 is without a doubt incorrect. That puts the C wave down as some complex structure and it should be be a simple 5 wave count.

This is Prechter's count I believe - 5 waves till Sep 21, but an A of course.

Also, the drop into Sept 21st off the May high was clearly only 3 waves for all indexes and he never resolves this.

I agree on that, that's one reason I have April as the end of A.


Short term...yup, I could be wrong there too, but it's working so far, and I'll change it when it doesn't. Such is the life of an EW theorist. :o)


I think wave 3 is beginning but it is not very convincing so far. Things are at another critical juncture.

My own autoregressive indicator shows something is about to happen - very similar to just before the wave 3 of 1 in October, but it could be a move down instead....

News Corp rose here against the offshore NAS trend that tends to drive it - seems to have made a nice bottom yesterday. This is one indicator that we are about to move up. Sometimes it leads the NAS instead of follows. So I made a small better on up....

David
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext