SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 217.53+1.5%Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pgerassi who wrote (70354)2/4/2002 5:38:32 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
Pete,

A 2.33GHz Throughbred (=Palomino) (assuming dumb shrink), would beat a 3.3GHZ NW

I think you are being too optimistic. 2.33 GHz is 10 x 66 MHz from 1.66 GHz, which is XP-2000+. So if the formula remains the same, 2.33 GHz would be 3000+.

On performance basis, XP-2000+ is somewhere in neighborhood of NW 2 GHz to NW 2.2 GHz. The problem is that Tbred and Barton will have only 256K L2, and it will limit the performance scaling vs. NW with 512K L2. Also, NW will get a 4.2 GB/s of bandwidth soon, and XP is limited to 2.1 GB/s, which will again limit performance scaling.

My prediction is that 2.33 GHz Tbred will at best equal NW 3.0 GHz.

Being at performance parity with older core (Athlon) vs. Intel's newest (NW) is not such a bad thing. I think AMD should at this point emphasize maturity of design, breadth of supporting chipsets and low power. I think high performance with low power consumption is the ticket for AMD in 2002. AMD has 3 aces in their pocket: PowerNow, .13u, .13u SOI. I hope AMD will use them to the full advantage.

Joe
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext