SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technology Stocks & Market Talk With Don Wolanchuk
SOXL 41.71-14.5%Dec 12 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (619)2/5/2002 7:59:11 AM
From: Moominoid  Read Replies (1) of 207311
 
Using the Edwardss and Magee terminology we have a wedge and an inverted head and shoulders bottom - though the RHS shoulder is a little below the head. Apparently the volume is falling off. From the e-wave persepctive I think the whole thing is a wave 5 which if true would imply that the traditional interpretation (i.e. a move to 2050 at least will happen).

In the northern summer of 2001 everyone was looking at a wedge (I was just starting to learn about e-wave). All thsoe e-wavers on CFZ were also talking about the wedge and it failed. e-wave could have told you that it wouldn't work as a wedge because it was in the wrong position. A lot of the e-wave people out there don't seem to really understand much about it and reading all their stuff is why I thought also the method was useless. Still to prove how useful it really is though.....

David
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext