SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (43518)2/5/2002 2:43:50 PM
From: E  Read Replies (2) of 82486
 
Those are your invectives, not accurate description. The thread is there. Perhaps I shall post from it some of the posts made to me there before I, and I alone, was silenced, only to have the bashing continue with me being unable to respond.

I wonder that you still think the subject is my posts, and your reaction to them, as opposed to whether it is decent to ban one participant in an argument in the middle of the argument and then bash that person when they are unable to respond or rebutt.

Well, of course since you call "crappola" a "mere" explaining, and the assertion that I called bia to speak for me "trivial," you can say that with less mortification than it warrants.

I have a wonderful record on making predictions here, btw: Look at this one! You are good at obfuscating, but not very good:

To:jlallen who wrote (43217)
From: E Monday, Feb 4, 2002 11:51 AM
View Replies (2) | Respond to 43232 of 43520

As usual, you merely insult me, offering no justification for your characterizations, no substantiation, whatever.
I was interested to know which of the behaviors I described, entirely accurately, you approved. As is your wont, you insult, and deny, but offer no evidence to support your denials. Where's the beef?

It is really very simple, and I do it as a matter of routine: If you have made a mistake, or said something unfair or intemperate, acknowledge, retract, apologize. That's what decent people do, JLA. If one leaves the ugliness lying there, one shouldn't be surprised that the offended party remains offended.

That is soooo simple.

Which do you disagree happened yet refuse to contradict?

Let's take them one at a time, because maybe i'll get some substance out of you if it's laid out simply.

Here was my first question:

Is it a refusal to eat crap to claim someone dissed our "young men in uniform" who are fighting against terrorism for this country, and then to refuse to either substantiate the accusation or apologize?

(You guys are hilariously predictable. I fully expect Neocon to come and and obfuscate in a gentlemanly style any minute now, as he usually does when his minions have made complete fools of themselves.)

Let me make the question above clearer. Did Poet diss our your men in uniform? Where?

I'd be interested in "interpretations" and "feelings," that she did, too.

I think you diss our service men and women, JLA. I have that feeling. Because you diss me and I am a woman and I perform services. In a minute I'm going to go make a chicken salad, for example.

Give a little substance, and we can move on to the next question.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext