SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (225215)2/5/2002 3:20:46 PM
From: Selectric II  Read Replies (1) of 769669
 
There's the answer. The Supreme Court should set 5 mos as the cut-off point.

No, that's the problem. As soon as the Supremes set 5 mos as the cut-off, medical technology will be available to allow it to be 4 mos. Then 3.

In fact, it will be suggested that rather than having an abortion at all, but to accommodate the unwanting woman, the fetus should be removed, intact, and transplanted to someone who wants it (at least for very early term pregnancies). The technology will be there, if it isn't already.

I might have just proposed the ultimate solution to accommodate everybody's needs. Rather than terminating a pregnancy, transplant it to someone who wants it!

What think?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext