| My explanation is precise and to the point. I will break down and reiterate. Of course, everyone knows you disagree with the opinions about you expressed, which explain his motives for ejecting you. However, they are, in fact opinions, and there is no objective way to resolve the issue. Therefore, any response invites prolonged wrangling, which is what he was trying to get rid of. The one exception is the business about bia. However, that is also unresolvable, therefore there is nothing worthwhile to be gained in arguing about it. All of your arguments are merely means to get back in, and preserve the right to determine when the matter is finished. Otherwise, you would have objected by PM, or complained on a collateral thread, (like Bush) at the time......... |
