Oh, look, again it is I who have carried the argument on, not JLA, not you, but moi, seulement moi! The power I have is remarkable, n'est-ce pas?
I would feel like screaming if I were you, too. You have my sympathy.
So your new fillip is that the standard for determining whether one has a legitimate complaint about having been treated boorishly by someone on a past occasion (I think it was boorish; you do not, not at all) is not a description of what the boor has done, including documents, but whether one has followed the boor to another venue peopled by uninvolved others to introduce the argument newly there? Or whether one has sent a PM to the boor?
Do tell me how that scenario would have played out, in your opinion! <g>
Interesting criteria, though. A most novel approach. |
