Twin Mining (formerly Twin-Gold) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Twin Mining (formerly Twin-Gold)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jpthoma1 who wrote (199)	2/5/2002 8:28:07 PM
From: Valuepro	Read Replies (1) of 613

jp, can't there be change of priorities for the good of the company/shareholders? Seems the right choice to me. As far as Ashton is concerned, I doubt it, but so what if they move ahead of TWG and are next with a diamond mine? Are you saying TWG isn't a good speculation because you think ACa will be next with a mine? I did well with Aber and they were second in the NWT. I also did well with SUF some years ago, and they were certainly not the first to mine diamonds in South Africa. Maybe I'm missing your point here, but differences of opinion makes for a more interesting ball game, eh?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next