SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Twin Mining (formerly Twin-Gold)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jpthoma1 who wrote (202)2/5/2002 8:39:33 PM
From: Valuepro  Read Replies (1) of 613
 
jp, you say you are a geologist, so would you kindly explain what is different about the Torngat dykes compared to the ones in South Africa which are generally narrower at the surface, and also become thin at depth. It's my understanding the Torngate dykes are at surface which is not the case for many of the the minable dykes in SA, and, as you well know, dykes can be mined at multiple locations compared compared to kimberlites. So, what's it matter how thick the dyke at 300 meters, or 500, or 1,000 if one can mine the first 10-50 meters over 42 kilometers, for example (not inclusive of blows)?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News