SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: FaultLine who wrote (18195)2/6/2002 11:07:44 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
To get a sense of how big the proposed budget increase would be, consider a few facts. Adjusting for inflation, this would be the largest year-to-year increase in the defense budget since the Korean War.

dtic.mil

Funny how the DOD budget in 1950 equated to 4.3% of total US GDP, and now equates to less than 3%, the lowest since before WWII.

The total Federal budget as a percentage of GDP was 15% in 1950, whereas in 1996 it was 20.8%, with DOD being budgeted at 3.4% of GDP.

As a percentage of the total Federal budget, DOD expenditures have also hit a post WWII low, amounting to 27% of the total Federal budget in 1950, but only 16% in 1995.

It also understates the fact that the largest portion of the DOD budget consists of salaries and benefits, not weaponry... One of the by-products of an all volunteer military.

Bush's 2003 budget apparently calls for $369 Billion for DOD, amounting to 3.6% of GDP.

Figures often beguile me, particularly when I have the arranging of them myself; in which case the remark attributed to Disraeli would often apply with justice and force: "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."

- Autobiography of Mark Twain

Hawk@tomsawyer.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext