SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets!
LRCX 143.23-2.9%Nov 18 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Robert Douglas who wrote (10174)2/7/2002 10:19:56 AM
From: Sampat Saraf  Read Replies (2) of 10921
 
When talking of replacements of PC's, I think there are several factors at work-

First, We need to distinguish between technology upgrade and just replacement due to failure of parts. Assuming a car does not last much more than 8 years, I do not see how PC's would not be replaced at least every 3-4 years just to keep the system functioning properly. The falling cost of newer more efficient parts and drop of support for older parts/softwares make it difficult trying to fix old systems than to buy a brand new one. In my case, I have found that when one part of the system breaks down (say a board), I find it is cheaper just buy a brand new system than spend few hours repairing and replacing a part.

In addition to need for replacement, I do not see how the PC demand could be saturated yet. I am not sure what the current penetration of PC's in US is but a typical family of four is already needing upto four PC's (like in my family's case) not even counting needs for mobiles when travelling/driving.

Of course when you put in global demand and market penetration the need will be even higher!

Just my 2 cents...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext