SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 46.96-2.8%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: andreas_wonisch who wrote (158017)2/7/2002 10:33:01 AM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
" If AMD wants to compete there, they have to go for the niches or convince Microsoft to support MIPS as well. "

You have to remember that PocketPC200x is WinCE3.0, and WInCE3.0 and 4.0 support more than StrongArm. The reason why Microsoft drew the line at StrongArm has more to do with it being the only one that has enough CPU power to provide the "experience" that Microsoft wanted. For that reason, I don't think that PocketPC2002 is available for the 133MHz StrongArm, although there is no code difference. Here are the processors supported with my version of Platform Builder for WinCE4.0

PROCESSOR_INTEL_386
PROCESSOR_INTEL_486
PROCESSOR_INTEL_PENTIUM
PROCESSOR_INTEL_PENTIUMII
PROCESSOR_MIPS_R4000
PROCESSOR_HITACHI_SH3
PROCESSOR_HITACHI_SH4
PROCESSOR_STRONGARM
PROCESSOR_ARM720
PROCESSOR_MIPS_R5000
PROCESSOR_SHx_SH3DSP

Distribution of applications isn't a problem either, you can target multiple processors and the installer works with ActiveSync to install the correct binary.

No, the problem has more to do with pricing, the prices I have seen for the current Alchemy chips are a lot more than the pricing I have seen for StrongArm, and Xscale is even cheaper than that...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext