Thank you, William -
Your thoughts are well taken. I am referring to a phenomenon that differs from adversarial debate, and the free exercise of differing opinions.
Perhaps I am seeing something that you are not.
What you perceive as a "bias" is my perception of a purposeful attack by a consortium of people, who are acting in concert out of motives diametrically opposed to the best interests of DMX and its investors.
I am as sceptical of them as they profess to be of DMX.
Such attacks, accompanied by "whispering campaigns" have been known to ruin companies in the US, and have resulted in litigation. You are perhaps unaware of the PMs I have received, advising me that DMX is being avoided "like the plague" by the professional investment community, and advising me to sell.
Well expressed opinions, and diversity of thought on any subject is welcome. Spirited debate is a joy. The repetition of twisted innuendo and malformed disinformation for the twentieth time in a month, by every member of the same group of posters, is none of the preceding.
However, in the event that I cannot meet your libertarian standards, please allow me to suggest an alternative...
siliconinvestor.com
Best regards,
Jim |
