SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 236.73-6.1%Jan 30 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (70981)2/8/2002 4:09:14 AM
From: Neil BoothRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Second, the guy did NOT get 50% higher performance by going to AMD.

Put it like this; the latest Athlon's outrun a PIII 1GHZ by more than 50%. It should be obvious that is what I was referring to, not to his recompile. He said his P4 1.7GHZ was 20% slower than a P3 1GHZ. See?

My whole point is that, for 99% of P4 users, its performance sucks, and they can't and don't want to do a recompile with Intel's compiler. Most of their binaries come with the distro, and are usually compiled as an i586, but sometimes (e.g. Debian) only compiled for an 386! Imagine how much P4 sucks there! GCC defines the performance of the CPU that people buy.

Recompiled x86-64 apps can be done with the system-standard compiler on free platforms, GCC, so you don't have a point there either.

Neil.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext