SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 217.91+0.9%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer who wrote (71034)2/8/2002 7:21:00 AM
From: TGPTNDRRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
Elmer, Re: < Who started this crazy notion that IBM chose the 286 over the 386? The 286 was out years before the 386 and IBM went so far as to license the i386 from Intel once it came out.>

Yes. This is how I remember the sequence.

Both IBM and Compaq had 286 machines. IBM was considered to be the 'real thing'. Compaq was a clone. Not as good.

* Intel came out with the 386.
* Compaq designed a BIOS to use the 386 and started selling
machines. They were faster than anything IBM had.
Surprised the heck out of the press.
* IBM came out with their PS2 line. The company I work for
bought the IBMs for about 2 years. (Microchannel. Real IBM.
Future Compatibility. *THE RIGHT STUFF* )
*It became clear the Compaqs were faster and 'More
Compatible' than the IBMs. At that point we quit buying
IBMs. So did a lot of other companies.

By then, IBMs reputation as the PC company was gone for ever.

tgptndr
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext