Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 174.01

-0.3%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: S100 who wrote (112577)	2/8/2002 1:23:43 PM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (2) of 152472

It does seem to be trivial stuff. Nothing big. I agree. If they really wanted to go after Qualcomm for it's structure of pro-forma accounting (particuarly Vesper), I could see their case. They could also go after the fact that they own portions of a variety of operators. I might disagree....but at least I could see their positions. The equity stakes in licensees seems to be an incredibally small isssue. The size of the stakes are tiny and how else should they account for them? I guess I should add that I dont understand the comment on receivables....so they might potentially have a small case there. However, the fact that they also added the stuff on nepotism and the accounting firm completely kills any chance for me to take their stuff seriously. It looks like they threw up a bunch of darts...just hoping to hit. They probably made their subscribers quite a bit of money today. If I was looking for a time to release a report like this, I would do it when a company is right at it's 52 wk low. You can get the combination of TA and FA working together. Probably made the firm look pretty good... Slacker

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next