SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TobagoJack who wrote (14781)2/10/2002 11:24:20 PM
From: AC Flyer  Read Replies (1) of 74559
 
Jay:

Take a look at the web site where I found the source material. I am surprised that these guys make this stuff available on the web. It is proprietary research for which the original client probably paid well.

I think there is a solid case that there is little downside to gold at this point, and that the projected depletion of existing mines will only be replaced by new production if the POG stays around $300. A lower price will therefore be self-correcting as total output will fall as mines are closed and not replaced. 2003 appears to be some kind of turning point, with an end to the secular trend of declining POG due to existing mine depletion.

The $64,000 question is will some exogenous event break the strong causal relationship between average production cost and POG that has existed for more than a decade. I can not predict the answer to this question. Others can (or think they can), apparently. We shall see.

The most interesting part of the data addresses WHICH gold miners to buy. You have to look at the original material to see this, but it very clearly shows which companies to buy and which not to buy. The #1 buy is Freeport McMoran Gold & Copper, apparently.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext