SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: AC Flyer who wrote (14757)2/11/2002 3:37:35 AM
From: FR1  Read Replies (1) of 74559
 
A few things to consider:

Under the worst case scenario, the maximum downside for gold price is $200/oz
That's a considerable drop from where we are.

Gold production costs have fallen by an average of $13/oz. each year since 1990
And they may fall even faster as time goes on. The technology used to find and mine gold is getting better and better. I once saw a piece on some of the latest gadgets used in screening mine walls for gold - very impressive. Someone once reported the amount of gold in seawater and it amazed me. Tons of it in the rivers of Alaska. The problem is developing the technology for sifting it out (which they are working on). Who knows what the future will bring.

Another item to consider is the introduction of new metallic compounds from the chemical engineers. Nanotechnology might make a lot of the need for gold obsolete. Gold is a great conductor of electricity but the new types of circuits might not need it.

So, in general, the need for gold might fall as the ability to mine it increases. You could wind up with a metal whose primary demand is from jewelry collectors (and they might not be interested as the price drops).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext