Will, Somebody on stockhouse got the link from the Twin site, that I was trying to find last night...
twinmining.com.
Is all the kimberlite below the raft really there? Was it probed? Is it something that can be predicted from other pipes with rafts? Its a good thing Cargo seems raft free!
I don't think anybody knows the answer to that, as few of the holes penetrated the raft material. It's an "artist's conception" and hopeful optimism at best, in my opinion. I would strongly prefer it if theories were actually drill tested before such drawings were made public.
From the same release, we have: twinmining.com. How do they determine these "field contours"?
That's the result of their mag survey.
Knowing from the kimberlite logs twinmining.com. that JI-FT-04 , reported on yesterday, said: "Olivine megacrystic kimberlite with 71.9 meters of limestone blocks (2.1m to 30.5 m thick) and ending in autolithic kimberlite" I wonder what the "country rock" dilution was, if any. Do they pick out the kimberlite for processing, or is it clearly demarcated where one starts, the other ends?
Well, they only sent kimberlite for processing, I'm quite sure. Why waste the money?
I just figured out how to link these. You have to go to the properties of the page (click opposite mouse button on page, look for it on bottom of menu)
Good to know.
The rest of that release is worth reading again:
twinmining.com;
Yes, it certainly is. So's the freakin date of that release. [grin]
Regards,
WillP |
