SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: re3 who wrote (7650)2/12/2002 12:43:55 PM
From: Louis V. Lambrecht  Read Replies (1) of 36161
 
Hi Howard! re:GATA, I subscribe to Bob Johson post
Message 17042114

I also stop reading any comment when the argument is "US$ world reserve currency".
See a most excellent post of Henry Volquardsen Message 17044092 explaining some catch 22's in the JPY situation.

For myself, I would extend the world currency problem to this:
major reserve currencies (like it or not, these are USD, JPY, EUR, CHF, GBP) are used by the central bankers as reserves. An intricated cross participation scheme which has proven unviable in business (best example is Germany).
This system will utimately fail as the Bretton Woods and the Smithsonian agreements.
So, I should agree with GATA.
But IMHO, gold can be a refuge for un-patriotic protection of wealth for those who can afford to immobilize some savings.
Guvmints cannot subsidize growth based on hard assets only: they need fiat currencies (for which the debt is partially paid back through inflation) and yet another world finacial agreement will be put in place.
With the usual rotation from gold into the new "promising" fiat currency. New cycle, rinse, wash, repeat.
BWTHDIK, just my 2 pesos.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext