SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The ENRON Scandal
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Raymond Duray who wrote (2889)2/16/2002 10:00:28 PM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) of 5185
 
"I do seem to recall that this topic was brought up in the committee meeting. From my recollection, she expressed the view that she felt that if only she could get through to Ken Lay, that he would take care of the concerns about an "accounting scandal". What truly baffles me is that once Lay betrayed Watkins by suppressing the aspects of an inquiry that would be useful in detecting fraud, Watkins still feels the Lay is A-ok. Such loyalty doesn't make sense to me. I guess that's why I'm not much of a candidate for corporate employment, eh? "--- RAY

At one point in her testimony, a Congressional member asked
her if she feared for her safety. My interpretation:
she was afraid.

Was Pitt at the SEC at the time she wrote the letter?

Cheers,

I am not sure why she defends Lay either.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News