SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nextwave Telecom Inc.
WAVE 8.155+0.1%Nov 12 3:55 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pcstel who wrote (691)2/18/2002 1:17:49 PM
From: pheilman_  Read Replies (1) of 1088
 
pcstel,

Bear with me, I like to see people use these units correctly.

Measurements in dBm are absolute measurements, relative to 1 milliwatt.
Measurements in dB are relative measurements, to some other measurements.

-100 dBm or -103 dBm are both pretty reasonable power levels for solid reception.

The difference is 3 dB, indeed 1/2 power.
3 dBm means 2 milliwatts.

The major issue is; could mobile units work? The performance limiting factor is the difference from the noise floor to the signal. With only a single site there is no interference from other sites which is usually a limitation for CDMA systems. So, yes, mobile units would probably work with the NextWave base stations.

Having spent years in RF propagation measurements, variations of 3 dB in power are pretty small, there are usually deep fades of 20 dB as you move around.

NextWave is probably just firing up the boomers to keep the licenses. Based on their lack of effort to get customers, but, I am impressed with the concept, light up with big sites, then infill as loading increases. Much easier to do with no frequency mapping required.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext