SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : CPN: Calpine Corporation
FRO 23.76+0.1%1:44 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Raymond Duray who wrote (312)2/18/2002 7:04:52 PM
From: Bob Rudd  Read Replies (1) of 555
 
<<The California squeeze had absolutely nothing to do with generating capacity. It occurred while the state was at 60% of maximum generating capacity. The whole thing was a fraudent scheme.>>I've heard some recent speculation that this is the case, but haven't really seen anyone make a solid case...If you run across an article, please post a link.
<<This [gov't providing limited credit guarantees] simply cannot occur in this current environment of skepticism in the capital markets.>>Excessive skepticism in the capital markets would actually be both the reason and justification [along with concerns over future energy shortfalls] for such action. But I'm not predicting that will occur, just considering it as a possiblity...a longshot.
<<Calpine is a busted stock. It's "story" has been blown completely out of the water.>> Yep & yep. Glance at the chart confirms this...and the superhot growth story is looking pretty cold. OTOH, the transition to cash cow story hasn't left the barn yet.
<This is, at best, a lousy investment for the next 8 years.>>I respectfully disagree. The Best case on this has substantial upside and a number of potential routes and catalysts. A hot summer, a cold winter, Enronitis concerns subsiding, a bit of regulatory help, solid free cash flow as curtailed construction liberates revenue from capex [03+], recognition that the parts are worth more than the current price. I see this coming together a lot sooner than 8 years, but the rest of this year will be dicey.
<<Potentially, it is much worse.>>Yep, there's risk.
Here's a comment from a Bill Miller associate that states the case a bit more eloquently and with more authority than I have:
6. What's the thesis with Calpine?
The thing I like about Calpine [down 84% over the past 12 months] is that psychological and cyclical issues are depressing the stock so much that I'm fairly confident it's mispriced in the one- to three-year time horizon. ... It looks to me that their comment that they can earn $1.70 this year is true; that the assumptions behind it make sense.
I think the company is currently in a depressed environment, which I don't think will continue. The psychological issue ... is that they have Enron dust on them. They're automatically thrown out [because] nobody wants to own these companies, so that increases the probability that things are mispriced. Calpine was ... going to be this new-age power generation company of the future. I don't know if that ever comes back. It probably doesn't.
If they just stop building [plants] altogether, and just use their maintenance capital expenditure, I believe it would be worth 10 times that free cash flow, which I believe is $18 or $19 right now. My analyst thinks it's worth $25, but I don't really agree with him yet.
thestreet.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext