Bull,
You said I was o for 2 because your sites said that the PE for FLEX and JNPR were na(not available)indicating to you they were unprofitable. My whole point is people should not make statements that are untrue or poorly substantiated. I am sure that you did not do this on purpose that is why I did and am pointing it out politely. If someone pointed out a technical inaccuracy on a stock that you owned I am sure you would correct them. I wonder what your reaction would be if they came back saying you were wrong basing there information from sources that were either unreliable or stating information as na(not available).Past Profits for FLEX AND JNPR are as follows: FLEX in quarter 12-2000 made .26 cents, 3-01 .22 cents, 6-01 .18 cents, 9-01 .15 cents, 12-01 .17 cents. And they are projected to make money every quarter this year.
JNPR 12-2000 .24 cents, 3-01 .25 cents, 6-01 ,09 cents, 9-01 .10 cents, 12-01 .05 cents. And projected to make money this year. And you insinuated by your statement they will never make money, which is absolutely false. multexinvestor.com All I am asking is before you say a company is loosing money check an annual report, a 10K, look at the balance sheet, just don't go somewhere that lists it as not available and quote it as a loss. If you don't care about fundamentals that is fine then don't quote them unless you know what you are saying, and as far as JDSU, and CIEN making a double bottom at least I said I know nothing about technical analysis, perhaps when you say a company is loosing money you should say you are guessing. I guess no one can have an opinion as to weather a stock is having a double bottom until after it has happened. If a stock bottoms at $10 goes to 20 back to 10 when do we know it is a double bottom? Do we wait until 11 could just be a blip up, 12, 13, 14 you are right I guess nobody knows until it is well past and then what good does it do you. Unless perhaps like me you want to take a chance while it is happening and stick your neck out and make a statement. By the way the third stock I referred to I not only corrected you I sited you the site and I have no intention of wasting my time going back nor will I waste my time replying to this post. The thing I love about this board is the lack of arguments and I will not contribute to that. But I ask you respectively do not say I am o for 2 when I am 2 for o. Please do your homework. You may not care about fundamentals but you would not want someone quoting bad technical analysis. I do thank you for starting this board. Take care.
Steve |
