SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 215.11+0.1%Dec 24 12:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: fyodor_ who wrote (72045)2/20/2002 6:00:27 PM
From: eCoRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
fyo:The problem with that is that clusters are just simply not as stable.

Link please. :)

According to the Linux parallel processing 'HowTo', one of the upsides to a cluster is: "The fact that replacing a "bad machine" within a cluster is trivial compared to fixing a partly faulty SMP yields much higher availability for carefully designed cluster configurations."

However, the downsides are: "With a few exceptions, network hardware is not designed for parallel processing. Typically latency is very high and bandwidth relatively low compared to SMP and attached processors." And also: "There is very little software support for treating a cluster as a single system."

linuxdoc.org

remember the Enterprise Customer survey...

Yeah, I saw that. But that list is based on a paradigm of non-replaceable boxes. If you've got $2-3k machines in there instead of $10-15K boxes, swapping a unit out becomes more cost-effective than putting more resources in "reliability" and "quality of service". All IMHO, of course.

eCo
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext