Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)

CSCO 75.91

+2.0%

11:38 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Stock Farmer who wrote (57784)	2/21/2002 10:19:31 AM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (2) of 77400

I agree with you completely. If Chambers was involved then not only should he be canned, but he should pay back his profits to employees and shareholders. I don't believe any dirty executives should be given any quarter whatsoever. They make to much damn money to even think about getting involved in schemes to get even richer. If over a billion in stock options exercises for Chambers wasn't enough for him to live on, then I'm all for him being prosecuted if he did something wrong. Now having said that, I personally believe that Chambers is as clean as they come. From all the things I've read about the guy, it seems to me that he has the highest integrity of any CEO I've read about. I think the treatment of his employees in the downturn was a testament to that. Of course, I could be naive here, but I simply wouldn't put Chambers in the same boat with Lay. Of course, I could be wrong. What the hell do I know about these guys anyway? I know just what I read.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next