| Right. However, you did flatly say all of those things, in the context of suggesting that I got it from an Italian Murdoch property (although the original, which I posted, was clearly in French), with the clear implication that it was all alarmist nonsense. You did so misrepresenting the content of the links you posted. In fact, you went searching for something with which to discredit the story, and therefore me, because the CNN story said nothing about lethality (and the sidebar link said whatever it is is very lethal), and the LA Times had the claim that it was potassium cyanide, and very lethal in water, along with the caveat of conflicting reports, in a paragraph earlier than the one that said it might be potassium ferrocyanide. Then,even after saying it might be the less toxic substance, the Times story pointed out that the gas was lethal, which you didn't mention. So, you mentioned only those things you thought would discredit my source, and therefore me, which amounts to a deliberate intent to mislead......... |