Big Dog's Boom Boom Room Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (6926)	2/23/2002 8:09:34 AM
From: whitepine	Read Replies (1) of 206094

Raymond, I did not endorse all of his findings uncritically. I agree with you about the fish (Economist has great article on this in current issue); and, I think his critics are correct about the issue of local environmental problems. Does this destroy his synthetic contribution in other areas? In general terms, I think not. You can nit-pick about small areas. These specifics become debatable. What bothers me is that Science mag. editor suggested science itself was under attack by Lomborg. This is incorrect. Science mag. (last I knew) has refused to allow him to reply. Additionally, in Wisconsin last week, one local Public Radio program and one national NPR (with Lovejoy and Wilson) promoted criticism of Lomborg, but he was not present to defend himself. This was a fair process (not). You don't like his lack of "soul." I understand that to mean you don't like his politics. Perhaps you embrace the ethics (sic) of S. Schneider who advocates scaring the public via distorted, politicized 'science' on Global Warming? Seems few are afraid of the distortion of science. Hello the ghost of Galileo!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next