SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technical Analysis- Indicators & Systems
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: wolfgangl who wrote (1893)7/6/1997 2:24:00 PM
From: TechTrader42   of 3325
 
Thanks for explaining the rescaling more. I'm still not sure why it doesn't matter that the formula doesn't incorporate "Std(((h+l+c)/3),28)."

Wasn't this part of the original notion of BradCCI? Did you just find that it doesn't have much effect on the result?

If you plot it in a window under CCI, you can see how it helps avoid a lot of false signals with CCI, if you ignore signals when "Std(((h+l+c)/3),28)" is low, or at least not volatile. You have to do it by eye-balling it -- there's no formula yet for making them both work together. Or is that what your formulation is -- is the price oscillator, in effect, a substitute for "Std(((h+l+c)/3),28)"?

But BNS1 really only includes CCI, not the BradCCI addtion that Bill Sandusky was using with his BNS.

I think the RedLine indicator is important, too -- or the slow stochastics proxy. It cuts out a lot of false signals, too, when you look for it to move along with CCI (or really BradCCI.).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News