SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 93.03+3.0%Nov 7 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: E. Charters who wrote (82452)2/23/2002 6:27:44 PM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (1) of 116753
 
But they burnt to structural collapse in only one hour in one building and 1/2 hour in the other

and one plane was going 100 mph faster then the other. I didn't think commercial jets could hit that velocity at sea level air density. Obviously they can

The kinetic energy and weight of the plane enormous though it was, was not the deciding factor in the destruction of the buildings. Fire was

As a fellow engineer, I think you need to review your calculations.

imho

pearly.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News