Ray,
Oh, I didn't recognize your "trick question." Sorry.
So, the straw man you set up is "speculators" who have bought up coastline and are now "demanding that they be provided a profit", that is asking for compensation, "from the counties that sensibly have curtailed said development." Oh, and the best part is the implied "they never really were going to develop it anyway," concept, if I read it correctly. Sort of a bass-ackwards protection racket.
Well, yes, of course, if you set it up this way, as a scam by "speculators" from the honest but hardworking "counties" (whatever they are) who have "sensibly" "curtailed" "said development." Well, by golly, I'm getting pretty incensed. No, dammit, I'm mad, and I'm not going to take it anymore.
Jeez, Ray, what planet are you from, and aren't they calling you home yet? You really do live in a strange world of conspiracy and intrigue, don't you?
Thank god we have the counties (which counties?) to sensibly protect the "people."
Hey, I got a better idea. Howzabout just letting them develop and sell those coastline homes but just require full disclosure and insurance requirements or disclaimer of Federal/state assistance? Isn't that a better way?
To a guy with a hammer, every problem is a nail. To a guy with paranoia, every transaction is a conspiracy.
Kb |
