SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 40.03-1.3%3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: wanna_bmw who wrote (160273)2/26/2002 4:23:44 PM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Wanna, "Who cares what they set as the end point?"

I do, and many others who designs systems for a work
to do. Again, why would a responsible chip designer
put up a specification for a condition that never occurs?
To create amusement and confusion?

"Intel's definition is probably the same as the industry accepted definition - and you don't need my help to tell you that. What you need is a book on introductory circuits."

No need to squirm. Introductory circuits have
nothing to do what-so-ever with a definition of max power
consumption of a CPU. This is all about a definition
of _software workload_.

For system designers, AMD makes available a small program
that loads every possible part of Athlon CPU and surpasses
in power consumption any known up-to-date piece
of application software:

amd.com

page 14.

That is AMD's definition of "max_power".
What is your Intel's definition, Mr. Cheerleader?

- Ali
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News