RE: I would encourage young women to look for other answers.
They will not get other answers at Planned Parenthood. A young pregnant girl who goes to PP will only be given one choice, abortion. All other choices will be stated to be irresponsible. In fact, PP has a smear campaign out against Abortion alternative providers (i.e. Crisis Pregnancy Centers). Why is that?
If PP was solely interested in women's health, why would they lash out at abortion alternatives?
If PP believed in choice, why would they not fully inform women of the risks involved in abortion?
To hear most pro-choicers, abortion is simply removal of a few cells of parasitic tissue from a woman's body. I have seen stats that suggest that as many as 20% of all abortions have complications, one of the most frequent being the puncture of the uterus wall. If a girl has an abortion and the very violent procedure punctures her uterus, then her best prognosis is sterility (after radical hysterectomy) and worst is death if the puncture is undetected for just a few days. Nevertheless, PP and most pro-choice liberals would have it that any twelve year old could get an abortion without parental involvement. I have a friend who got his 14-yearold girlfriend pregnant. The school counselor sent them to PP (its just a little tissue), she had an abortion. Three days later, she started bleeding. At 14, she was sterile.
My argument is that the pro-choicers dare to suggest that the state has the right to send my precious daughter to an abortion mill without my consent. That one day, I could learn that my daughter was sterile or dead because she was steered to a very risky medical procedure without my consent or knowledge by some agenda-driven counselor who could care less about her well-being. |
